Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2024 195 • VG SZ III 2024 195 Generato dall'IA

Zoning Dispute Over Building Permit Approval

Numero d'incarto III 2024 195
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The petitioners challenged a municipal council's decision, upheld by higher cantonal authorities, to approve a building permit for adjacent property owners, which the petitioners argued violated zoning regulations concerning building height and density. The court reasoned that the cantonal planning authority correctly interpreted the relevant development plan provisions, finding that the authorized construction adhered to the allowed building envelope and density limits, and thus dismissed the appeal as unfounded.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Zoning Dispute Over Building Permit Approval: The court reasoned that the cantonal planning authority correctly interpreted the relevant development plan provisions, finding that the authorized construction adhered to the allowed building envelope and density limits, and thus dismissed the appeal as unfounded.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza di costruzione prescrizioni di zona proprietà immobiliare superamento dell'altezza massima deroga alla licenza edilizia problema urbano

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Costs are imposed on the losing party in the final order.
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 41
Municipal Council Permit Challenge Regarding Zoning Volume Calculation
III 2021 107
Company v. Municipal Council (Building Permit Zoning Dispute)
III 2019 122
Building Permit Denial Upheld Over Density and Height Violations
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
III 2023 16
Building Permit Validity Challenge

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Costs are imposed on the losing party in the final order.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2024 195 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. Juli 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Jeremias Fellmann, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________ und B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr. C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Wollerau, Hauptstrasse 15, Postfach 335, 8832 Wollerau, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n4. D.________ und E.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. F.________, \n |\n

\n\n

\n