Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2024 189 • VG SZ III 2024 189 Generato dall'IA

Planning Appeal Against Administrative Decision and Corporate Interests

Numero d'incarto III 2024 189
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party challenged a decision related to a planning matter, involving local, cantonal, and federal administrative bodies, along with an interested corporation and another corporation. The court's reasoning addressed the specific procedural and substantive grounds raised in the appeal against the lower instance decisions, ultimately determining whether the factual and legal basis for the prior rulings was sound under the relevant planning and administrative laws.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Planning Appeal Against Administrative Decision and Corporate Interests: The court's reasoning addressed the specific procedural and substantive grounds raised in the appeal against the lower instance decisions, ultimately determining whether the factual and legal basis for the prior rulings was sound under the relevant planning and administrative laws.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
motivazione nel merito impugnazione di decisioni amministrative approvazione dei piani motivi di pubblico interesse legittimazione a ricorrere principi pianificatori Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 127
Planning Authority Decision Appeal
III 2018 9
Appeal Against Planning Approval Decision
III 2019 77
Appeal Against Planning Decision
III 2020 91
Appeal Regarding Spatial Planning and Land Use Decisions
III 2023 153
Appeal Against Municipal Planning Decision

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2024 189 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. August 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Jeremias Fellmann, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________ \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n4. D.________AG, \n Beschwerdegegnerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, \n5. Korporation F.________, \n Beigeladene, \n |\n

\n\n

\n