Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2024 179 • VG SZ III 2024 179 Generato dall'IA

Building Permit Appeals Litigation

Numero d'incarto III 2024 179
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves appeals concerning a building permit, with one party appealing a decision by the local municipal council and the spatial development office, while the other party challenges the appeal decisions related to the same permit. The court's reasoning, though not explicitly detailed in the provided excerpt, would address the legality and factual basis of the administrative decisions regarding the granting or denial of the building permit under relevant planning and construction law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Building Permit Appeals Litigation: The court's reasoning, though not explicitly detailed in the provided excerpt, would address the legality and factual basis of the administrative decisions regarding the granting or denial of the building permit under relevant planning and construction law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza edilizia comunale legittimazione a contestare licenza disciplina urbanistica diritto di superficie deroga alla licenza edilizia altezza massima dell'edificio Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Applied to determine the costs for the proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
III 2018 96
Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld
II 2020 67
Municipal Building Permit Appeal Dismissal
III 2010 99
Appeal Regarding Building Permit Validity and Zoning Regulations
III 2019 162
Appeal Against Construction Permit Denial Upheld

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Applied to determine the costs for the proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2024 179 III 2024 183 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. September 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Jeremias Fellmann, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer (im Verfahren III 2024 179), \n Beschwerdegegner (im Verfahren III 2024 183), \n Ziff. 1 vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n Vorinstanz (in den Verfahren III 2024 179 + 183), vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt F.________, \n \n1. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz (in den Verfahren III 2024 179 + 183), |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Baubewilligung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: