Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2024 168 • VG SZ III 2024 168 Generato dall'IA

Residence Permit Hardship Appeal Dismissal

Numero d'incarto III 2024 168
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Spese processuali a carico dell'autorità / Stato

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a decision from the cantonal Department of Economic Affairs concerning a foreigner's residence status, specifically the conversion of an F permit to a B permit based on hardship grounds. The appellant sought the conversion of their F permit to a B permit citing exceptional personal circumstances constituting hardship that warranted the requested status change under immigration law. The court reasoned that the established legal criteria for granting a hardship permit were not met by the presented facts, meaning the discretionary power to convert the permit type could not be exercised in favor of the appellant, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Residence Permit Hardship Appeal Dismissal: The appellant sought the conversion of their F permit to a B permit citing exceptional personal circumstances constituting hardship that warranted the requested status change under immigration law. The court reasoned that the established legal criteria for granting a hardship permit were not met by the presented facts, meaning the discretionary power to convert the permit type could not be exercised in favor of the appellant, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
permessi di dimora caso di rigore statuto giuridico diritto economico misura di allontanamento nel diritto degli stranieri potere discrezionale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal judicial proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2024 168 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. Februar 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Irene Thalmann, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Andrea Reutter, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n 1. A.________ 2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n 1. Volkswirtschaftsdepartement, Bahnhofstrasse 15, \n Postfach 1180, 6431 Schwyz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ausländerrecht (Härtefallbewilligung; Umwandlung von Ausweis F in Ausweis B) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: