Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2024 139 • VG SZ III 2024 139 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld

Numero d'incarto III 2024 139
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party challenged a decision that upheld a building permit granted to another party for the construction of a residence on a plot of land, arguing that the decision disregarded necessary planning law considerations regarding the plot's suitability for development. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the prior authorities had correctly assessed the factual circumstances and appropriately applied the relevant planning law, specifically finding that the decision-making bodies had adequately considered and weighed the planning law requirements concerning the plot's development potential and integration into the surrounding area, thereby not violating the appellant's rights.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the prior authorities had correctly assessed the factual circumstances and appropriately applied the relevant planning law, specifically finding that the decision-making bodies had adequately considered and weighed the planning law requirements concerning the plot's development potential and integration into the surrounding area, thereby not violating the appellant's rights.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
obbligo del permesso di costruzione suolo edificativo diritto fondiario permessi di dimora deroga alla licenza edilizia incentivazione immobiliare Korporationsrecht (Gründung einer Flurgenossenschaft) | Korporationsrecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was used to order the appellant to pay the court fees.
Generato dall'IA
III 2018 96
Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
III 2017 226
Appeal Against Building Permit Decision Dismissed
III 2020 199
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed
III 2019 162
Appeal Against Construction Permit Denial Upheld

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was used to order the appellant to pay the court fees.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2024 139 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. Februar 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marco Lacher, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat C.________, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n3. E.________, \n Beschwerdegegnerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw F.________, \n |\n

\n\n

\n