Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2024 120 • VG SZ III 2024 120 Generato dall'IA

Heritage Associations v. Municipal Council on Building Permit

Numero d'incarto III 2024 120
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Two heritage protection associations appealed a decision by the municipal council regarding a building permit, which was subsequently upheld by higher cantonal authorities, concerning a construction project. The court ruled against the associations, reasoning that the objections raised regarding the project's impact on the architectural character and surrounding landscape were not sufficiently substantiated to overturn the previous administrative decisions, as the disputed construction appeared to comply with existing planning and zoning regulations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Heritage Associations v. Municipal Council on Building Permit: The court ruled against the associations, reasoning that the objections raised regarding the project's impact on the architectural character and surrounding landscape were not sufficiently substantiated to overturn the previous administrative decisions, as the disputed construction appeared to comply with existing planning and zoning regulations.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza edilizia comunale norme per l'edilizia prescrizioni di zona legittimazione a contestare licenza associazione autorità amministrativa Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2017 157
Heritage Organizations v. Municipality (Standing to Appeal Demolition Permit)
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
III 2021 37
Municipality v. Cantonal Decisions on Building Permit Rejection
III 2017 141
Building Permit Appeals Regarding Public Participation and Planning Procedures
III 2018 99
Property Owners v. Municipal Council (Construction Permit Challenge)

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2024 120 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Mai 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Jeremias Fellmann, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. Schweizer Heimatschutz, Villa Patumbah, Zollikerstrasse 128, 8008 Zürich, \n vertreten durch den Schwyzer Heimatschutz, c/o C.________, Präsidentin, \n2. Schwyzer Heimatschutz, c/o C.________, Präsidentin, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________ \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n