Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2024 110 • VG SZ III 2024 110 Generato dall'IA

Property Owners' Appeal Against Municipal Land-Use Plan Amendment

Numero d'incarto III 2024 110
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A group of property owners filed an appeal against the municipal council's decision regarding a partial land-use plan, specifically concerning the coordination of a 2022 ordinance amendment and the subsequent approval resolution by the cantonal government. The court was tasked with reviewing the legality of these planning and building law decisions, which centered on the implementation of the specific partial land-use plan, ultimately upholding or dismissing the appeal based on established planning law principles and procedural correctness regarding the municipal and cantonal planning stages.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Planungs- und Baurecht (Teilnutzungsplanung \"Breitgasse, Arth\"): Koordination VGE III 2022 111 v. 26.1.2023 mit Genehmigungsbeschluss RRB Nr. 538/2024 v. 2.7.2024 | Planungs- und Baurecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
terreno comunale diritto fondiario approvazione dei piani revisione del piano regolatore piano speciale di utilizzazione legittimazione a contestare licenza
Generato dall'IA
III 2021 157
Appeal Against Municipal Land Use Decision Upheld
III 2018 181
Appeal Against Partial Zoning Plan Revision
III 2019 109
Appeal Against Municipal Zoning Decision
III 2023 121
Appeal Challenging Municipal Development Plan Approval
III 2023 153
Appeal Against Municipal Planning Decision

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2024 110 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 15. Juli 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________ \n \n1. B.________, \n2. C.________, \n3. D.________ \n4. G.________, \n5. H.________, \n6. I.________, \n7. J.________, \n8. K.________, \n9. L.________, \n10. M.________, \n11. N.________, \n12. O.________, \n13. P.________ \n14. Q.________, \n15. R.________, \n16. S.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. T.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Arth, Rathausplatz 6, Postfach 263, 6415 Arth, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. U.________ \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Teilnutzungsplanung \"X.________, Arth\"): Koordination VGE III 2022 111 vom 26.1.2023 mit Genehmigungsbeschluss RRB Nr. 538/2024 vom 2.7.2024 |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: