Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2023 90 • VG SZ III 2023 90 Generato dall'IA

Municipality Traffic Regulation Compensation Appeal

Numero d'incarto III 2023 90
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves a plaintiff appealing a decision that denied them compensation for damages allegedly caused by the municipality and the canton following the implementation of new traffic regulations that negatively impacted their property's accessibility and value. The court reasoned that the implemented traffic restrictions constituted a legitimate exercise of public authority for the general welfare, specifically concerning traffic safety and flow, and that the resulting economic impact on the property owner did not rise to the level of an unconstitutional expropriation or a compensable burden, as the restrictions were generally applicable and did not impose a disproportionate individual sacrifice.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Forderung aus öffentlich-rechtlichem Vertrag bzw. Konzessionsvertrag (Kostenbeteiligung an Unterhalt bzw. Spezialentsorgung des mit Schadstoffen belasteten Seesediments im Bootshafen) | Umweltschutzrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
indennità d'espropriazione risarcimento dei danni da incidente stradale responsabilità civile del comune regolamenti di attuazione minaccia per la sicurezza pubblica valore economico
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 54
Property Owner v. Municipality on Road Improvement Levy Proportionality
III 2022 193
Local Traffic Restriction Upheld Against Infrastructure Protection Justification
STK 2025 10
Appeal of Traffic Violation Judgment
STK 2023 82
Appeal Regarding Traffic Violation Judgment
STK 2020 56
Traffic Violation Appeal: Negligence Conviction Upheld, Penalty Adjusted

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 90 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Urteil vom 27. September 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Kläger, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt G.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirk Küssnacht, vertreten durch den Bezirksrat, \n Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, \n Beklagter 1, \n2. Kanton Schwyz, handelnd durch den Regierungsrat, \n Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Beklagter 2, \n dieser wiederum vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, \n |\n

\n\n

\n