Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2023 9 • VG SZ III 2023 9 Generato dall'IA

Welfare Recipient vs. Welfare Authority: Substantiation of Expenses

Numero d'incarto III 2023 9
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant challenged a decision by the welfare authority, subsequently upheld by the cantonal government, to reduce their economic assistance based on insufficient justification of expenses. The court determined that while the appellant had a right to assistance, the authority acted within its discretion in demanding sufficient substantiation for the claimed expenditures, and since the appellant failed to provide adequate documentation to demonstrate the necessity of the costs for securing subsistence, the decision to reduce the aid was legally sound.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Welfare Recipient vs. Welfare Authority: Substantiation of Expenses: The court determined that while the appellant had a right to assistance, the authority acted within its discretion in demanding sufficient substantiation for the claimed expenditures, and since the appellant failed to provide adequate documentation to demonstrate the necessity of the costs for securing subsistence, the decision to reduce the aid was legally sound.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
assistenza sociale diritti economici vertenza di assicurazione sociale procedura di gratuito patrocinio diritto di manifestare appropriazione indebita di fondi Sozialhilfe (Kürzung der wirtschaftlichen Hilfe) | Sozialhilfe
Generato dall'IA
III 2024 39
Appeal Regarding Social Welfare Benefits Determination
III 2017 2
Care Recipients' Appeal on Social Assistance and Legal Fees Upheld in Part
III 2023 58
Appeal Regarding Judicial Review of Welfare Debt Enforcement and Procedural Costs
III 2016 35
Social Assistance Repayment Calculation Review and Partial Appeal Success
III 2023 113
Social Welfare Repayment Obligation Upheld on Misreported Housing Compensation

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 9 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. April 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Thomas Rentsch, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Fürsorgebehörde B.________, \n \n \n1. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Sozialhilfe (Kürzung der wirtschaftlichen Hilfe) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: