Municipality Land Use Plan Revision Appeal
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe case concerns an appeal against the partial revision of the land use plan for the "Bahnhof Süd, Goldau" area by the municipality, which was upheld by the cantonal government. The court reasoned that the appellant's constitutional claim regarding the principle of equal treatment was unfounded because the planning adjustments, which addressed specific infrastructural needs in the designated area, constituted a situation objectively distinguishable from the circumstances of the properties cited by the appellant for comparison, thereby justifying different regulatory treatments.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAMunicipality Land Use Plan Revision Appeal: The court reasoned that the appellant's constitutional claim regarding the principle of equal treatment was unfounded because the planning adjustments, which addressed specific infrastructural needs in the designated area, constituted a situation objectively distinguishable from the circumstances of the properties cited by the appellant for comparison, thereby justifying different regulatory treatments.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 73 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. November 2023 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________ \n vertreten durch B.________, c/o C.________, \n2. B.________, c/o C.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n
\n|\n |\n gegen |\n
\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Arth, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n
\n|\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Teilrevision Nutzungsplanung Gemeinde Arth: Bahnhof Süd, Goldau) |\n \n\n
\n