Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2023 67 • VG SZ III 2023 67 Generato dall'IA

Building Permit Rejection Upheld on Planning Grounds

Numero d'incarto III 2023 67
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A petitioner challenged a decision concerning a building permit application that was ultimately rejected by the municipal council, upheld by the cantonal government, and subsequently reviewed by the administrative court. The court determined that the petitioner had not sufficiently demonstrated that the spatial planning requirements regarding the integration of the building into the surrounding area were met, nor had they proven that the rejected application resulted from an arbitrary application of planning law, thus upholding the lower instances' rejection of the building permit.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Building Permit Rejection Upheld on Planning Grounds: The court determined that the petitioner had not sufficiently demonstrated that the spatial planning requirements regarding the integration of the building into the surrounding area were met, nor had they proven that the rejected application resulted from an arbitrary application of planning law, thus upholding the lower instances' rejection of the building permit.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
obbligo del permesso di costruzione urbanistica deroga alla licenza edilizia non attribuzione a una zona motivo di revisione superamento dell'altezza massima
Generato dall'IA
III 2023 96
Building Permit Refusal Upheld on Zoning Grounds
III 2019 174
Building Permit Denial Upheld Due to Planning Violation
III 2020 27
Building Permit Denial Upheld for Violation of Land Use Plan
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
III 2020 190
Building Permit Rejection Appeal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 67 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 5. Dezember 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n