Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2023 57 • VG SZ III 2023 57 Generato dall'IA

Property Owner v. Authorities (Retroactive Building Permit Denial)

Numero d'incarto III 2023 57
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A property owner sought a retroactive building permit for a structure that was built without the required authorization, which was denied by the local authorities and subsequently upheld by the Cantonal Government and the Cantonal Appeals Authority. The applicant challenged these decisions, arguing that the structure complied with zoning regulations and that granting the permit would not negatively impact public interest or third-party rights. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the structure did not meet the required setback distances, and because the non-conformity was substantial and the relevant planning law required strict adherence to setback regulations, the prerequisites for granting a retroactive permit were not fulfilled, regardless of the applicant's compliance with other zoning aspects.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Property Owner v. Authorities (Retroactive Building Permit Denial): The applicant challenged these decisions, arguing that the structure complied with zoning regulations and that granting the permit would not negatively impact public interest or third-party rights. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the structure did not meet the required setback distances, and because the non-conformity was substantial and the relevant planning law required strict adherence to setback regulations, the prerequisites for granting a retroactive permit were not fulfilled, regardless of the applicant's compliance with other zoning aspects.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza edilizia a posteriori proprietà immobiliare conformità alla zona violazione delle distanze legali norme per l'edilizia edificio pubblico Planungs- und Baurecht (Nachträgliche Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.
Generato dall'IA
III 2021 50
Property Owner v. Cantonal Authority (Building Permit Denial)
III 2022 133
Property Owner v. Municipality: Building Permit Denial and Setback Enforcement
III 2025 131
Owner v. Municipality on Building Permit Denial
III 2016 191
Property Owner Appeal of Building Permit Denial Upheld
III 2022 49
Appeal Regarding Building Permit Denial Based on Setback Violation

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 57 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. Juni 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n 1. Bezirksrat Gersau, Ausserdorfstrasse 7, Postfach 59, 6442 Gersau, 2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, 3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Nachträgliche Baubewilligung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: