Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2023 52 • VG SZ III 2023 52 Generato dall'IA

Challenge to Expert Opinion Cost Assessment in Planning Law

Numero d'incarto III 2023 52
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A litigant challenged the assessment of costs associated with an expert opinion required by a municipal council in a planning and building law matter, where the litigant had initiated the procedure. The court found that the procedural law allowed the administrative authority to charge the costs of an expert opinion to the applicant, even if the opinion was deemed necessary for the decision, and since the assessment of these costs was conducted appropriately according to the relevant regulations, the appeal against the cost decision was dismissed.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Challenge to Expert Opinion Cost Assessment in Planning Law: The court found that the procedural law allowed the administrative authority to charge the costs of an expert opinion to the applicant, even if the opinion was deemed necessary for the decision, and since the assessment of these costs was conducted appropriately according to the relevant regulations, the appeal against the cost decision was dismissed.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
costi della perizia spese per l'allestimento dei piani impugnazione di decisioni amministrative norme per l'edilizia determinazione dei compensi perizia giuridica Planungs- und Baurecht (Kosten eines Gutachtens) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The court ordered the appellant to pay the court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 52 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. Juni 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Gemeinderat Morschach, Schulstrasse 6, 6443 Morschach, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Kosten eines Gutachtens) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: