Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2023 31 • VG SZ III 2023 31 Generato dall'IA

Cantonal Land Use Planning Appeal Decision Upheld

Numero d'incarto III 2023 31
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved competing appeals against a decision by the cantonal government regarding land use planning, specifically challenging the approval of a development project. The court reasoned that the procedural requirements for issuing the decision had been met by the lower instances and that the substantive planning decisions, which involve a degree of discretion, were not demonstrably contrary to applicable law or the principle of proportionality, thus upholding the challenged planning resolution against the grounds raised in the appeals.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Cantonal Land Use Planning Appeal Decision Upheld: The court reasoned that the procedural requirements for issuing the decision had been met by the lower instances and that the substantive planning decisions, which involve a degree of discretion, were not demonstrably contrary to applicable law or the principle of proportionality, thus upholding the challenged planning resolution against the grounds raised in the appeals.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
apprezzamento in materia di pianificazione diritto fondiario decisione motivata urbanistica motivazione nel merito deroga alla licenza edilizia Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2020 91
Appeal Regarding Spatial Planning and Land Use Decisions
III 2021 174
Appeal Against Cantonal Zoning Decisions
III 2024 66
Cantonal Council Decision on Land Use Planning and Water Protection Zones Upheld in Part
III 2023 121
Appeal Challenging Municipal Development Plan Approval
III 2021 157
Appeal Against Municipal Land Use Decision Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 31 III 2023 35 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. August 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n3. C.________, \n Beschwerdeführer (Verfahren III 2023 31), alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. D.________, \n \n1. E.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin (Verfahren III 2023 35), \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. F.________, \n |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. G.________, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen (Verfahren III 2023 31+35), |\n

\n\n

\n