Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2023 28 • VG SZ III 2023 28 Generato dall'IA

Property Owner v. Zoning Board Regarding Building Permit Compliance

Numero d'incarto III 2023 28
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A property owner challenged administrative decisions, culminating in a final decision that upheld a building permit for a neighboring property, arguing that the construction violated planning laws regarding density and setback rules, thereby negatively impacting their property rights. The court reasoned that the construction adhered to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the permit was granted, specifically that the relevant setback and density calculations were correctly applied according to the applicable planning instrument, and therefore, the appellant failed to demonstrate a violation of their legally protected interests that would warrant overturning the permit.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Property Owner v. Zoning Board Regarding Building Permit Compliance: The court reasoned that the construction adhered to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the permit was granted, specifically that the relevant setback and density calculations were correctly applied according to the applicable planning instrument, and therefore, the appellant failed to demonstrate a violation of their legally protected interests that would warrant overturning the permit.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
conformità alla zona licenza edilizia violazione delle distanze legali violazione degli oneri dell'autorizzazione diritto di proprietà confine particellare Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 28 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. Juli 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Wollerau, Hauptstrasse 15, Postfach 335, 8832 Wollerau, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n