Appeal Against Continuation of Pre-Trial Detention for Foreign National
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe matter concerns a challenge to a decision from the Forced Measures Court and the Migration Office regarding a foreign national's status. The core issue involved whether the continuation of a pre-trial detention measure was legally justified based on the factual circumstances presented. The court reasoned that the relevant criteria for maintaining the detention measure were still met, thereby upholding the lower court's decision and dismissing the appeal, concluding that the grounds for the detention remained valid under the applicable procedural law.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAAppeal Against Continuation of Pre-Trial Detention for Foreign National: The core issue involved whether the continuation of a pre-trial detention measure was legally justified based on the factual circumstances presented. The court reasoned that the relevant criteria for maintaining the detention measure were still met, thereby upholding the lower court's decision and dismissing the appeal, concluding that the grounds for the detention remained valid under the applicable procedural law.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 200 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Februar 2024 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n
\n|\n |\n 1. Amt für Migration, Steistegstrasse 13, Postfach 454, 6431 Schwyz, 2. Zwangsmassnahmengericht, Kollegiumstrasse 28, \n Postfach 2267, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n
\n\n
\n