Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2023 159 • VG SZ III 2023 159 Generato dall'IA

Building Permit Revocation Upheld Due to Spatial Planning Non-Compliance

Numero d'incarto III 2023 159
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party challenged a decision regarding the revocation of a building permit that had been issued following a successful objection to a previous permit, where the initial objection argued that the proposed building did not comply with spatial planning requirements, and the court reasoned that the administrative authority correctly applied the relevant planning law provisions concerning setback distances and building volume when upholding the revocation, finding that the initial issuance of the permit was factually and legally flawed due to non-compliance with established spatial planning regulations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF; Building Permit Revocation Upheld Due to Spatial Planning Non-Compliance: A party challenged a decision regarding the revocation of a building permit that had been issued following a successful objection to a previous permit, where the initial objection argued that the proposed building did not comply with spatial planning requirements, and the court reasoned that the administrative authority correctly applied the relevant planning law provisions concerning setback distances and building volume when upholding the revocation, finding that the initial issuance of the permit was factually and legally flawed due to non-compliance with established spatial planning regulations.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
conformità alla licenza edilizia ritiro dell'autorizzazione violazione delle norme edilizie obbligo di pianificare distanze dal confine approvazione dei piani Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF
Costs were imposed on the losing party as per this article.
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 166
Building Permit Revocation Upheld Due to Height, Footprint, and Setback Violations
III 2020 110
Appeal Regarding Denial of Building Permit Due to Non-Compliance with Spatial Planning Regulations
III 2023 67
Building Permit Rejection Upheld on Planning Grounds
III 2019 100
Permit Denial Upheld on Spatial Planning Grounds
III 2019 174
Building Permit Denial Upheld Due to Planning Violation

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

Costs were imposed on the losing party as per this article.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 159 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. März 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________ \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n