Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2023 141 • VG SZ III 2023 141 Generato dall'IA

Student Promotion Appeal Dismissed

Numero d'incarto III 2023 141
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A student, represented by their father, appealed a decision regarding school promotion, where the lower courts had previously ruled against the student. The court dismissed the appeal to the extent that it was considered, affirming the prior rulings in the matter of school law and education concerning promotion.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

2C_601/2023; Student Promotion Appeal Dismissed: The court dismissed the appeal to the extent that it was considered, affirming the prior rulings in the matter of school law and education concerning promotion.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
decisioni in materia di promozione legittimazione a ricorrere revoca disciplinare conflitto genitoriale riesame di una decisione precedente revoca della decisione amministrativa Schulrecht/Bildungswesen (Promotion) | Verschiedenes

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
2C_601/2023
This case number refers to the final decision of the Federal Supreme Court that dismissed the appeal, which is the substantive outcome mentioned in the provided text.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
2C_601/2023

This case number refers to the final decision of the Federal Supreme Court that dismissed the appeal, which is the substantive outcome mentioned in the provided text.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n III 2023 141 |\n Eine Beschwerde gegen diesen Entscheid wurde vom Bundesgericht mit Urteil 2C_601/2023 vom 3. April 2024 abgewiesen, soweit darauf eingetreten wurde. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. September 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch ihren Vater B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. C.________ (Schule) \n2. Landammann des Kantons Schwyz, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Schulrecht/Bildungswesen (Promotion) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: