Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2023 124 • VG SZ III 2023 124 Generato dall'IA

Council Construction Decision Affirmation

Numero d'incarto III 2023 124
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves a challenge to a decision by the local council regarding a construction matter, with appeals against the decision being subsequently rejected by higher cantonal authorities. The reviewing court dismissed the appeal because the appellants failed to demonstrate that the challenged decision violated any specific legal provisions or that the procedural steps taken by the lower authorities were fundamentally flawed or arbitrary, thus upholding the previous rulings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 106 Abs. 1 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Council Construction Decision Affirmation: The reviewing court dismissed the appeal because the appellants failed to demonstrate that the challenged decision violated any specific legal provisions or that the procedural steps taken by the lower authorities were fundamentally flawed or arbitrary, thus upholding the previous rulings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza di costruzione ente locale controllo della procedura politica edilizia licenza edilizia concessa a titolo precario decisione formatrice

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 106 Abs. 1 BGG
The appeal is dismissed on the merits based on this provision.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Costs are awarded against the appellants because their appeal was unsuccessful.
Generato dall'IA
III 2020 189
Council Decision Challenge Affirmed
III 2019 162
Appeal Against Construction Permit Denial Upheld
III 2018 96
Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
III 2020 199
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 106 Abs. 1 BGG

The appeal is dismissed on the merits based on this provision.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Costs are awarded against the appellants because their appeal was unsuccessful.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 124 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. September 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________ und B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n4. E.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n |\n

\n\n

\n