Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2023 121 • VG SZ III 2023 121 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Challenging Municipal Development Plan Approval

Numero d'incarto III 2023 121
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Multiple parties filed an appeal challenging the decision of a cantonal administrative body upholding a municipal council's approval of a development plan concerning specific land use regulations. The central issue involved the legality and proper procedure for establishing this development plan, which governed the area in question. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower administrative decisions concerning the development plan were procedurally sound and did not violate substantive planning law, thereby confirming the validity of the contested planning measure against the objections raised by the appellants.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Challenging Municipal Development Plan Approval: The central issue involved the legality and proper procedure for establishing this development plan, which governed the area in question. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower administrative decisions concerning the development plan were procedurally sound and did not violate substantive planning law, thereby confirming the validity of the contested planning measure against the objections raised by the appellants.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
approvazione dei piani terreno comunale utilizzazione del fondo legittimazione a contestare licenza censure procedurali impugnazione di decisioni amministrative
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 121 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. März 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________ und B.________, \n2. C.________ und D.________, \n3. E.________, \n4. F.________, \n5. G.________ und H.________, \n6. I.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin J.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Ingenbohl, Parkstrasse 1, Postfach 253, \n 6440 Brunnen, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Gestaltungsplan Q.________ Ingenbohl) |\n \n\n

\n

Sachverhalt: