Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2023 107 • VG SZ III 2023 107 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Protective Care Decision

Numero d'incarto III 2023 107
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a decision by the Child and Adult Protection Authority (KESB) concerning an individual under protective care. The appellant challenged the KESB's ruling, necessitating a review of the authority's actions and the underlying circumstances requiring protective measures. The court ultimately upheld the KESB's decision, reasoning that the existing protective order remained necessary based on the facts presented, thereby affirming the prior determination regarding the individual's care and supervision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Protective Care Decision: The appellant challenged the KESB's ruling, necessitating a review of the authority's actions and the underlying circumstances requiring protective measures. The court ultimately upheld the KESB's decision, reasoning that the existing protective order remained necessary based on the facts presented, thereby affirming the prior determination regarding the individual's care and supervision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
autorità di protezione degli adulti messa in pericolo del bene del figlio dovere di diligenza diritto di visita sorvegliato violazione di norme di protezione decisione motivata
Generato dall'IA
III 2020 73
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision
III 2020 60
Appeal Against KESB Decision on Financial Measures in Child and Adult Protection
III 2020 169
Appeal Against Child Protection Authority Ruling on Protective Measures
III 2022 73
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Protective Measures Decision
III 2021 95
Appeal of Protective Services Decision

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2023 107 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. November 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Thomas Rentsch, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n Irene Thalmann, Richterin lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n c/o Altersund Pflegeheim B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) \n C.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n