Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 99 • VG SZ III 2022 99 Generato dall'IA

Agricultural Entity v. Municipality on Zoning Revision

Numero d'incarto III 2022 99
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An agricultural entity challenged a municipal zoning revision concerning land use planning, specifically appealing a higher cantonal administrative decision that upheld the revision. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appellant had not sufficiently demonstrated that the zoning revision, which determined the allowable use for the land in question, constituted a substantial infringement of their proprietary rights, thereby finding no grounds to overturn the administrative decisions below.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Agricultural Entity v. Municipality on Zoning Revision: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appellant had not sufficiently demonstrated that the zoning revision, which determined the allowable use for the land in question, constituted a substantial infringement of their proprietary rights, thereby finding no grounds to overturn the administrative decisions below.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
fondo agricolo terreno comunale variante del piano regolatore diritto di utilizzazione motivi di revisione violazione delle norme edilizie
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 154
Zoning Dispute: Agricultural to Residential Land Use Change
III 2021 51
Appeal Against Building Permit on Agricultural Land
III 2022 158
Land Use Designation Appeal Affirmed
III 2021 118
Corporation v. Municipal Council (Zoning Permit Denial)
III 2025 78
Land Use Rezoning Challenge Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 99 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. September 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Lachen, Alter Schulhausplatz 1, Postfach 263, 8853 Lachen, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, \n \n1. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Revision Nutzungsplanung Lachen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: