Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 89 • VG SZ III 2022 89 Generato dall'IA

Companies v. Municipality and Cantonal Authorities on Land Use

Numero d'incarto III 2022 89
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Two companies, as applicants, challenged administrative decisions concerning land use, specifically related to a homeowners association, where the municipality council, a cantonal development office, and the cantonal government acted as lower courts, and an individual was the opposing party. The court likely reviewed the legality of the administrative decisions regarding the land use application or dispute presented by the applicants, ultimately upholding or overturning the previous rulings based on administrative law and zoning regulations pertinent to the involved parties and the subject property.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Companies v. Municipality and Cantonal Authorities on Land Use: The court likely reviewed the legality of the administrative decisions regarding the land use application or dispute presented by the applicants, ultimately upholding or overturning the previous rulings based on administrative law and zoning regulations pertinent to the involved parties and the subject property.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
utilizzazione del fondo domanda indirizzata all'autorità incentivazione immobiliare terreno comunale decisioni di associazioni di imprese associazione Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
This provision was cited in the dispositive to determine the allocation of court costs.
Generato dall'IA
III 2021 107
Company v. Municipal Council (Building Permit Zoning Dispute)
III 2021 165
Municipal Development Rights Dispute and Land Use Interpretation
III 2017 68
Property Owners v. Cantonal Authorities on Zoning Compliance
III 2020 91
Appeal Regarding Spatial Planning and Land Use Decisions
III 2022 158
Land Use Designation Appeal Affirmed

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

This provision was cited in the dispositive to determine the allocation of court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 89 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. März 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________ GmbH \n2. B.________ AG \n Beschwerdeführerinnen, \n \n1. STWEG C.________, \n Beigeladene, alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________ |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________ \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n4. F.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt G.________ \n |\n

\n\n

\n