Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2022 87 • VG SZ III 2022 87 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Change of Mandated Representative by Child and Adult Protection Authority

Numero d'incarto III 2022 87
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerned an appeal against a decision by the Child and Adult Protection Authority to change the mandated representative for an individual. The reviewing court upheld the decision, reasoning that the Authority was empowered to change the mandated representative when new information or circumstances suggested the prior representative was no longer suitable or that a different appointment better served the represented person's interests, and the initial representative had not demonstrated an error in the Authority's assessment of suitability or the need for a change.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Change of Mandated Representative by Child and Adult Protection Authority: The reviewing court upheld the decision, reasoning that the Authority was empowered to change the mandated representative when new information or circumstances suggested the prior representative was no longer suitable or that a different appointment better served the represented person's interests, and the initial representative had not demonstrated an error in the Authority's assessment of suitability or the need for a change.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
autorità di protezione degli adulti nomina del rappresentante messa in pericolo del bene del figlio modifica di un'autorizzazione mutamento di giurisprudenza domanda indirizzata all'autorità

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Applied to rule on the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 87 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Juli 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Irene Thalmann, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) Ausserschwyz, Eichenstrasse 2, 8808 Pfäffikon SZ, Vorinstanz, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Mandatsträgerwechsel/ weitere Begehren) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: