Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2022 86 • VG SZ III 2022 86 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Protective Assistance Arrangement for Adult

Numero d'incarto III 2022 86
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Spese processuali a carico dell'autorità / Stato

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a lower authority's decision regarding a protective assistance arrangement (Vertretungsbeistandschaft) for an adult. The appellant challenged the establishment of this arrangement, which involved appointing an assistant to manage the affairs of the protected person. The court ultimately upheld the decision of the lower authority, reasoning that the establishment of the protective assistance was legally justified based on the demonstrated necessity to protect the interests of the adult, thereby affirming the lower authority's finding regarding the need for external support in managing their affairs.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Protective Assistance Arrangement for Adult: The appellant challenged the establishment of this arrangement, which involved appointing an assistant to manage the affairs of the protected person. The court ultimately upheld the decision of the lower authority, reasoning that the establishment of the protective assistance was legally justified based on the demonstrated necessity to protect the interests of the adult, thereby affirming the lower authority's finding regarding the need for external support in managing their affairs.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
interesse giuridicamente protetto autorità di protezione degli adulti autorità con potere di nomina procedura di gratuito patrocinio dovere di assistenza contributo per l'assistenza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 86 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Juli 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Irene Thalmann, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, c/o ________, Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) Innerschwyz, Postfach 1240, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, \n \n1. C.________ und D.________, \n Beigeladene, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Vertretungsbeistandschaft nach