Appeal Against Protective Assistance Arrangement for Adult
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe case concerns an appeal against a lower authority's decision regarding a protective assistance arrangement (Vertretungsbeistandschaft) for an adult. The appellant challenged the establishment of this arrangement, which involved appointing an assistant to manage the affairs of the protected person. The court ultimately upheld the decision of the lower authority, reasoning that the establishment of the protective assistance was legally justified based on the demonstrated necessity to protect the interests of the adult, thereby affirming the lower authority's finding regarding the need for external support in managing their affairs.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Protective Assistance Arrangement for Adult: The appellant challenged the establishment of this arrangement, which involved appointing an assistant to manage the affairs of the protected person. The court ultimately upheld the decision of the lower authority, reasoning that the establishment of the protective assistance was legally justified based on the demonstrated necessity to protect the interests of the adult, thereby affirming the lower authority's finding regarding the need for external support in managing their affairs.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.
Testo completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 86 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Juli 2022 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Irene Thalmann, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, c/o ________, Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n
\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) Innerschwyz, Postfach 1240, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, \n \n1. C.________ und D.________, \n Beigeladene, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. E.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Vertretungsbeistandschaft nach