Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 80 • VG SZ III 2022 80 Generato dall'IA

Residence Determination Appeal

Numero d'incarto III 2022 80
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant, challenging a prior decision, contested the determination of their residence by the local municipal council and the cantonal government, which was subject to civil law concerning domicile. The court reached its verdict by examining the factual circumstances surrounding the appellant's claimed and actual living situation as established by the lower authorities, ultimately upholding the prior determination regarding the residence in question.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Residence Determination Appeal: The court reached its verdict by examining the factual circumstances surrounding the appellant's claimed and actual living situation as established by the lower authorities, ultimately upholding the prior determination regarding the residence in question.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
domicilio effettivo diritto d'ingresso e di soggiorno determinazione della competenza legittimazione a ricorrere sfratto mutamento della residenza del minore Zivilrecht (Wohnsitz) | Verschiedenes

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
This provision was cited for allocating court costs for the unsuccessful appeal.
Generato dall'IA
III 2013 5
Challenge to Refusal of Residence Permit Extension
III 2022 11
Residency Appeal Review
III 2022 174
Appeal of Foreign National's Residence Status Denial
BEK 2019 32
Appeal Against Debt Enforcement Seizure Based on Disputed Domicile
III 2023 82
Appeal Against Refusal of Residency Permit and Expulsion Order

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

This provision was cited for allocating court costs for the unsuccessful appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 80 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. Oktober 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Oxana Straub, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Lachen, Alter Schulhausplatz 1, Postfach 263, 8853 Lachen, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Zivilrecht (Wohnsitz) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: