Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 75 • VG SZ III 2022 75 Generato dall'IA

Teacher Selection Transparency and Equal Treatment

Numero d'incarto III 2022 75
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party challenged the rejection of their application for a teaching position in a public school, arguing that the selection process, which included an evaluation by a third party that was not publicly disclosed, violated their right to equal treatment under the law. The court reasoned that while a public body has discretion in teacher selection, this discretion is limited by the principles of equal treatment, non-discrimination, and transparency, thus requiring that all evaluation criteria and the results thereof be made accessible to the applicant to allow for meaningful legal recourse against potentially arbitrary decisions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Teacher Selection Transparency and Equal Treatment: The court reasoned that while a public body has discretion in teacher selection, this discretion is limited by the principles of equal treatment, non-discrimination, and transparency, thus requiring that all evaluation criteria and the results thereof be made accessible to the applicant to allow for meaningful legal recourse against potentially arbitrary decisions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
parità di trattamento e trasparenza criteri di selezione accesso alla professione divieto di esercizio della professione valutazione dei posti di lavoro nomina di un impiegato statale Kosten Sonderschulung (Internatsaufenthalt) | Verschiedenes

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
This article was cited for the decision regarding court costs.
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 27
Education Department Contract Award Dispute
III 2022 12
Appeal Against Public Contract Award Exclusion Due to Insufficient Key Personnel Experience
III 2018 116
Appeal Against Appointment of Child Representative
BEK 2022 125
Administrative Office v. Individual Regarding Civil Service Refusal
III 2022 4
Public Procurement Appeal Suspension Revocation for Modular School Facility Lease

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

This article was cited for the decision regarding court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 75 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Oktober 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Volksschulen und Sport, Kollegiumstrasse 28, \n Postfach 2191, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n3. B.________ \n |\n

\n\n

\n