Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 49 • VG SZ III 2022 49 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Building Permit Denial Based on Setback Violation

Numero d'incarto III 2022 49
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party challenged a municipal decision regarding the refusal to grant a building permit for an extension to an existing building, arguing that the refusal was based on an improperly interpreted or incorrectly applied municipal development plan provision concerning the setback distance from a neighboring property boundary. The court reasoned that the relevant provision of the development plan mandated a specific minimum setback, and since the proposed extension did not meet this minimum distance to the boundary, the lower authorities were correct in their denial, thus upholding the decision against the appellant.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Regarding Building Permit Denial Based on Setback Violation: The court reasoned that the relevant provision of the development plan mandated a specific minimum setback, and since the proposed extension did not meet this minimum distance to the boundary, the lower authorities were correct in their denial, thus upholding the decision against the appellant.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
violazione delle distanze legali proroga del permesso edilizio legittimazione a contestare licenza proprietà immobiliare violazione degli oneri dell'autorizzazione distanza dal confine

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appeal is dismissed, and costs are imposed on the appellant.
Generato dall'IA
III 2021 53
Building Permit Denial Upheld Over Setback Violations
III 2022 133
Property Owner v. Municipality: Building Permit Denial and Setback Enforcement
III 2019 84
Building Permit Setback Dispute
III 2019 119
Municipal Resolution Zoning Setback Appeal
III 2025 131
Owner v. Municipality on Building Permit Denial

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appeal is dismissed, and costs are imposed on the appellant.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 49 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 11. August 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Ingenbohl, Parkstrasse 1, Postfach 253, 6440 Brunnen, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n