Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2022 47 • VG SZ III 2022 47 Generato dall'IA

Waste Collection Procurement Termination Upheld

Numero d'incarto III 2022 47
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A company appealed a decision by lower administrative bodies to terminate a public procurement procedure concerning the collection of residual and green waste, arguing the termination was unlawful. The court reasoned that public procurement law grants the awarding authority broad discretion in the award process, including the right to abandon the procedure if circumstances that formed the basis for the invitation to tender have significantly changed or if the tender is no longer expedient, and since the termination decision, made before the award, was not obviously arbitrary or contrary to law, it was to be upheld.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 108 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Waste Collection Procurement Termination Upheld: The court reasoned that public procurement law grants the awarding authority broad discretion in the award process, including the right to abandon the procedure if circumstances that formed the basis for the invitation to tender have significantly changed or if the tender is no longer expedient, and since the termination decision, made before the award, was not obviously arbitrary or contrary to law, it was to be upheld.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
appalti pubblici potere di apprezzamento amministrativo esclusione dalla procedura di appalto risoluzione di contratto lotta contro gli sprechi decisione motivata

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 108 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG

Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because it concerned the refusal of the request for reconsideration regarding the decision on costs.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Imposed the costs of the federal proceedings on the appellant.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 47 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. August 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirk Einsiedeln, handelnd durch den Bezirksrat, \n Hauptstrasse 78, Postfach 161, 8840 Einsiedeln, \n2. Gemeinde Unteriberg, handelnd durch den Gemeinderat, Waagtalstrasse 27, 8842 Unteriberg, \n3. Gemeinde Oberiberg, handelnd durch den Gemeinderat, \n Jessenenstrasse 20, 8843 Oberiberg, \n4. Gemeinde Alpthal, handelnd durch den Gemeinderat, Dorfstrasse 19, 8849 Alpthal, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n|\n Gegenstand |\n Öffentliches Beschaffungsrecht (Vergabe Kehrichtund Grüngutsammlung; Abbruch des Verfahrens) |\n

\n\n

\n \n