Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 46 • VG SZ III 2022 46 Generato dall'IA

Corporate Road Access Dispute Against District and Cantonal Authorities

Numero d'incarto III 2022 46
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns a dispute over road management, specifically the removal of a driveway or road access, initiated by two corporate entities challenging decisions made by a District Council and a Cantonal Government. The court's reasoning, though not detailed in the provided excerpt, would address the legality and procedural correctness of the administrative decisions regarding the removal of the specified road access, based on relevant road and administrative law pertaining to the authority of the lower administrative bodies.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Corporate Road Access Dispute Against District and Cantonal Authorities: The court's reasoning, though not detailed in the provided excerpt, would address the legality and procedural correctness of the administrative decisions regarding the removal of the specified road access, based on relevant road and administrative law pertaining to the authority of the lower administrative bodies.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
strada d'accesso autorità amministrativa diritto della circolazione stradale risoluzione del conflitto giurisdizionale strada comunale e-government Verschiedenes (Strassenwesen; Wegrodel, Wegabrufung) | Verschiedenes

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was cited to govern the allocation of court costs for the appeal.
Generato dall'IA
III 2025 113
Challenge to Road Usage Plan Designation
III 2018 126
Road Contribution Classification and Infrastructure Scope Appeal
III 2023 125
Municipality v. Cantonal Government Regarding Building Permit Reinstatement for Local Road Extension
III 2010 115
Administrative Appeal Against District and Cantonal Council Decisions
III 2019 231
Spatial Planning Dispute: Municipal and Cantonal Decisions Challenged

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited to govern the allocation of court costs for the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 46 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Dezember 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Irene Thalmann, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________ AG \n2. B.________ GmbH \n Beschwerdeführerinnen, beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. C.________ |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirksrat Küssnacht, Seeplatz 2/3, Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Verschiedenes (Strassenwesen; Wegrodel, Wegabrufung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: