Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2022 41 • VG SZ III 2022 41 Generato dall'IA

Municipal Council Permit Challenge Regarding Zoning Volume Calculation

Numero d'incarto III 2022 41
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A group of petitioners challenged a municipal council's decision to grant a building permit for a multi-family house, arguing that the approval violated zoning regulations concerning the maximum permissible building volume and density, specifically asserting that the building's height projection over the neighboring property constituted an illegal encroachment. The court reasoned that the relevant zoning rule regarding building volume was based on the building's footprint projected onto the ground plan, not on the specific placement of the roof structure, and found that the municipal council correctly interpreted the relevant provisions, thereby upholding the permit approval as the projected volume fell within the legally defined limits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Municipal Council Permit Challenge Regarding Zoning Volume Calculation: The court reasoned that the relevant zoning rule regarding building volume was based on the building's footprint projected onto the ground plan, not on the specific placement of the roof structure, and found that the municipal council correctly interpreted the relevant provisions, thereby upholding the permit approval as the projected volume fell within the legally defined limits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza edilizia comunale prescrizioni di zona altezza della costruzione norme per l'edilizia abusivismo edilizio legittimazione a contestare licenza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant has to pay the costs of the Federal Supreme Court proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 41 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Juni 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n 1. A.________ 2. B.________ 3. C.________ 4. D.________ 5. E.________ 6. F.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw G.________ |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Gemeinderat Wollerau, Hauptstrasse 15, Postfach 335, 8832 Wollerau, \n Vorinstanz, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. H.________ |\n

\n\n

\n