Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 24 • VG SZ III 2022 24 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Cantonal Administrative Decision Affirmed

Numero d'incarto III 2022 24
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved an appeal against a cantonal government council's decision, where the appellants sought to overturn an earlier ruling concerning a matter of administrative law. The court reasoned that the appeal lacked a sufficient legal basis because the contested decision by the lower authority was demonstrably sound and correctly applied the relevant legal standards to the established facts, thus affirming the prior decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Cantonal Administrative Decision Affirmed: The court reasoned that the appeal lacked a sufficient legal basis because the contested decision by the lower authority was demonstrably sound and correctly applied the relevant legal standards to the established facts, thus affirming the prior decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
autorità amministrativa ricorso del personale e-government referendum chiesto dall'autorità sentenze interpretative diritto di ottenere una decisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Applied for the allocation of court costs.
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 207
Appeal of Cantonal Administrative Decision Regarding Statutory Authority and Procedure
III 2021 174
Appeal Against Cantonal Zoning Decisions
III 2010 115
Administrative Appeal Against District and Cantonal Council Decisions
III 2021 157
Appeal Against Municipal Land Use Decision Upheld
III 2021 81
Appeal Between Municipalities Concerning Cantonal Government Involvement

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Applied for the allocation of court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 24 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Juli 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________ \n2. B.________ \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. C.________ |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n