Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 20 • VG SZ III 2022 20 Generato dall'IA

Challenge to Epidemic-Based Business Closure Order

Numero d'incarto III 2022 20
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A petitioner challenged an administrative order for a temporary business closure issued on epidemiological grounds by a regional department of the interior. The court reasoned that the administrative decision imposing the closure was based on a competent authority acting within its legal mandate to protect public health during an epidemic, finding the measure proportionate and necessary given the assessed risk to the population.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG; Challenge to Epidemic-Based Business Closure Order: The court reasoned that the administrative decision imposing the closure was based on a competent authority acting within its legal mandate to protect public health during an epidemic, finding the measure proportionate and necessary given the assessed risk to the population.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
chiusura dell'azienda impugnazione di decisioni amministrative rischi per la salute sanità pubblica ragione di polizia motivi che possono invocarsi

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings because her appeal was dismissed.
Generato dall'IA
III 2023 33
Restaurant Closure Upheld Over COVID Certificate Enforcement Failure
III 2021 170
Restaurant Closure Order Mootness Appeal
III 2021 203
Appeal Against Expired COVID-19 Business Closure Order Declared Moot
II 2020 68
Loss of Earnings Compensation Denial for Business Closure
III 2021 73
Post Office Closure Challenge Upheld on Public Interest Grounds

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings because her appeal was dismissed.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 20 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 7. Juni 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Departement des Innern, Kollegiumstrasse 28, Postfach 2160, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Gesundheitsrecht (Anordnung einer temporären Betriebsschliessung aus epidemiologischen Gründen) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: