Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 189 • VG SZ III 2022 189 Generato dall'IA

Corporate Appeal of District Authority Decision

Numero d'incarto III 2022 189
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A corporate entity, acting as the appellant, challenged a decision made by a district authority regarding a matter that proceeded through the lower court, and the court addressed the appeal by examining the grounds raised by the appellant against the ruling of the prior instance. The court's reasoning, while not fully detailed in the provided excerpt, would ultimately determine whether the appellant met the legal threshold for overturning the administrative body's decision based on the presented facts and applicable law.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Öffentliches Beschaffungsrecht (Arbeitsvergabe Rathaus und Justizgebäude Leutschen; BKP 283.1 Heiz- und Kühldecken) | Öffentliches Beschaffungsrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
autorità amministrativa persona giuridica legittimazione a ricorrere surrogazione dell'ente pubblico ricorso del personale presupposti legali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision governs the imposition of court costs for the dismissed appeal.
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 101
Corporation v. District Council Contract Award Appeal
III 2017 110
Appeal Against District Council Administrative Decision
I 2024 51
Appeal of Corporate Dispute Ruling Affirmed
III 2024 189
Planning Appeal Against Administrative Decision and Corporate Interests
III 2021 85
Company v. District Council: Enforcement of Repayment Ruling

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision governs the imposition of court costs for the dismissed appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 189 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. März 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n 1. Bezirk Höfe, handelnd durch den Bezirksrat, \n Verenastrasse 4b, Postfach 124, 8832 Wollerau, \n Vorinstanz, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n