Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 183 • VG SZ III 2022 183 Generato dall'IA

Traffic License Revocation Proportionality Review

Numero d'incarto III 2022 183
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual appealed a decision by a traffic authority to revoke their driving privileges due to a driving offense, arguing that the penalty was excessively harsh and disproportionate given their specific circumstances, including potential professional hardship. The court reasoned that while the offense warranted a penalty under traffic law, the authority had not sufficiently considered the mitigating factors presented by the appellant when determining the severity of the license withdrawal, thus necessitating a review and potential adjustment of the administrative penalty to ensure proportionality.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Traffic License Revocation Proportionality Review: The court reasoned that while the offense warranted a penalty under traffic law, the authority had not sufficiently considered the mitigating factors presented by the appellant when determining the severity of the license withdrawal, thus necessitating a review and potential adjustment of the administrative penalty to ensure proportionality.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca della licenza condurre revoca della decisione amministrativa gravità della pena circostanze attenuanti proporzionalità circostanza attenuante Strassenverkehrsrecht (Sicherungsentzug) | Strassenverkehrsrecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2021 204
Traffic Authority License Revocation Appeal
III 2019 188
Appeal of Driving License Withdrawal Based on Traffic Offenses
III 2018 176
Driver License Revocation Appeal Based on Culpability Assessment
III 2018 90
Traffic License Revocation Due to Repeated Violations
III 2020 33
Driver's License Revocation Appeal Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 183 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Februar 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Thomas Rentsch, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Verkehrsamt, Schlagstrasse 82, Postfach 3214, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenverkehrsrecht (Sicherungsentzug) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: