Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 171 • VG SZ III 2022 171 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Interlocutory Decision on Municipal and Cantonal Administrative Actions

Numero d'incarto III 2022 171
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against an interlocutory decision dated November 25, 2022, within the main proceedings, where the appellants challenged decisions made by the municipal council, the spatial development office, and the cantonal government council. The court's reasoning, though not explicitly detailed in the provided excerpt, pertains to the procedural status or substantive findings of that prior interlocutory decision, leading to the current review of the administrative actions taken by the three lower authorities in the underlying matter.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Interlocutory Decision on Municipal and Cantonal Administrative Actions: The court's reasoning, though not explicitly detailed in the provided excerpt, pertains to the procedural status or substantive findings of that prior interlocutory decision, leading to the current review of the administrative actions taken by the three lower authorities in the underlying matter.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
decisione incidentale autorità comunali controllo della procedura posizioni amministrative procedimento pregiudiziale procedura direttrice
Generato dall'IA
III 2024 15
Interlocutory Decision on Appeal Admissibility in Land Use Matter
III 2021 81
Appeal Between Municipalities Concerning Cantonal Government Involvement
III 2010 115
Administrative Appeal Against District and Cantonal Council Decisions
III 2024 44
Appeal Against Municipal Council Administrative Decision
III 2022 24
Appeal Against Cantonal Administrative Decision Affirmed

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 171 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Zwischenbescheid vom 25. November 2022 im Hauptverfahren III 2022 164 (und 163) |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer (Beschwerdegegner im Verfahren \n III 2022 163), \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Unteriberg, Waagtalstrasse 27, Postfach 46, 8842 Unteriberg, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen (in den Verfahren III 2022 163 + 164), |\n

\n\n

\n