Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 162 • VG SZ III 2022 162 Generato dall'IA

Municipal Council Extension of Gravel Pit Obligations Appeal

Numero d'incarto III 2022 162
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A group of individuals appealed a decision by the municipal council that granted a third extension for fulfilling obligations related to the dismantling and infilling of gravel pits, challenging the legality of this extension. The court reasoned that the municipality had the authority to grant extensions under planning and building law, and since the appellants failed to demonstrate that the council abused its discretion or that the extension was otherwise unlawful, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the council's decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Municipal Council Extension of Gravel Pit Obligations Appeal: The court reasoned that the municipality had the authority to grant extensions under planning and building law, and since the appellants failed to demonstrate that the council abused its discretion or that the extension was otherwise unlawful, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the council's decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
obbligo comunale proroga del permesso edilizio elezioni locali apprezzamento in materia di pianificazione ricorso per carenza decisione di estensione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant must bear the judicial costs of the appeal proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
III 2023 3
Residents v. Municipal Council (Gravel Pit Reclamation)
III 2018 233
Appeal Concerning Gravel Pit Restoration Deadlines and Objection Cost Allocation
III 2018 154
Municipal Gravel Extraction Denial Upheld Based on Existing Use Rights
III 2021 135
Municipal Land Use Appeal Dismissed
III 2021 157
Appeal Against Municipal Land Use Decision Upheld

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant must bear the judicial costs of the appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 162 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. März 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n3. C.________, \n4. D.________, \n5. E.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n 1. Gemeinderat Tuggen, R.________strasse 14, Postfach 159, \n 8856 Tuggen, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Abbau und Auffüllung von Kiesgruben: dritte Fristverlängerung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: