Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 160 • VG SZ III 2022 160 Generato dall'IA

Company v. Agricultural Authority Regarding Right of Deposit as Servitude

Numero d'incarto III 2022 160
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A company appealed a determination by the agricultural authority that a recorded right of deposit, intended for storing materials, constituted a servitude requiring official approval under agricultural law, which it lacked, rendering it void. The court reasoned that the right of deposit, viewed objectively as a burden on the property, satisfied the legal criteria for a servitude requiring administrative authorization because it significantly restricted the property's use, regardless of the parties' subjective intent regarding the nature of the right, thus upholding the authority's finding of non-compliance.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Land- und Forstwirtschaftsrecht (Feststellungsverfügung; Bewilligungspflicht bzw. Nichtigkeit einer Dienstbarkeit ''Ablagerungsrecht'') | Land- und Forstwirtschaftsrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto al deposito diritto agrario diritto di proprietà autorità amministrativa banca agricola diritto soggettivo
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 68
Land Pre-emption Right Based on Agricultural Enterprise Status and Customary Pasturing Recalculation
III 2020 9
Property Owner Appeal Regarding Agricultural Holding Status and Leasehold Inclusion
III 2021 212
Appeal Dismissed: Agricultural Property Status Lacking Statutory Work Requirement Threshold
III 2021 209
Security Deposit Enforcement Pending Appeal
III 2024 109
Agricultural Operation Commercial Classification Appeal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 160 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. September 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Landwirtschaft, Hirschistrasse 15, Postfach 5182, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, \n \n1. C.________ AG \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________ \n \n1. E.________, \n2. F.________, \n Beigeladene, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Landund Forstwirtschaftsrecht (Feststellungsverfügung; Bewilligungspflicht bzw. Nichtigkeit einer Dienstbarkeit 'Ablagerungsrecht') |\n

\n\n

\n

Sachverhalt: