Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 158 • VG SZ III 2022 158 Generato dall'IA

Land Use Designation Appeal Affirmed

Numero d'incarto III 2022 158
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellants challenged a decision by local and cantonal authorities concerning a land use matter, specifically involving the designation of land. The court reasoned that the appellants failed to demonstrate that the contested administrative decision violated substantive law or that the authorities improperly exercised their discretion when applying the relevant zoning and spatial planning regulations to the specific parcel in question, thereby affirming the previous rulings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Land Use Designation Appeal Affirmed: The court reasoned that the appellants failed to demonstrate that the contested administrative decision violated substantive law or that the authorities improperly exercised their discretion when applying the relevant zoning and spatial planning regulations to the specific parcel in question, thereby affirming the previous rulings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
utilizzazione del fondo potere di apprezzamento amministrativo ente locale violazione delle norme edilizie terreno comunale cambiamento di destinazione di zona edificabile

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Costs were imposed on the appellants because their appeal was dismissed.
Generato dall'IA
III 2021 157
Appeal Against Municipal Land Use Decision Upheld
III 2020 91
Appeal Regarding Spatial Planning and Land Use Decisions
III 2023 31
Cantonal Land Use Planning Appeal Decision Upheld
III 2021 174
Appeal Against Cantonal Zoning Decisions
III 2022 127
Planning Authority Decision Appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Costs were imposed on the appellants because their appeal was dismissed.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 158 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. Mai 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n3. C.________, \n4. D.________, \n5. E.________, \n6. F.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. G.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Sattel, Dorfstrasse 22a, 6417 Sattel, \n2. Amt für Wald und Natur, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1184, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n