Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 154 • VG SZ III 2022 154 Generato dall'IA

Zoning Dispute: Agricultural to Residential Land Use Change

Numero d'incarto III 2022 154
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A petitioner challenged a municipal zoning decision regarding the change of land use from agricultural to residential for a specific plot, which was ultimately upheld by the cantonal government and associated agencies. The court reasoned that the local authority had correctly applied the spatial planning law, finding that the decision to permit the change was not arbitrary because the existing agricultural use was no longer viable for the specific parcel, and the development served a legitimate public interest that outweighed the preservation of the agricultural designation in that location.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Zoning Dispute: Agricultural to Residential Land Use Change: The court reasoned that the local authority had correctly applied the spatial planning law, finding that the decision to permit the change was not arbitrary because the existing agricultural use was no longer viable for the specific parcel, and the development served a legitimate public interest that outweighed the preservation of the agricultural designation in that location.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
fondo agricolo diritto fondiario terreno comunale destinazione ad uso abitativo cambiamento di destinazione revisione del piano regolatore
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 99
Agricultural Entity v. Municipality on Zoning Revision
III 2019 29
Zoning Challenge to Agricultural Building Conversion Rejection Upheld
III 2025 78
Land Use Rezoning Challenge Upheld
III 2023 54
Developer v. Cantonal Government (Agricultural Zoning Denial)
III 2019 26
Zoning Amendment Challenge Upheld Against Objectors

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 154 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. März 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Schübelbach, Grünhaldenstrasse 3, \n Postfach 74, 8862 Schübelbach, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n3. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n4. Amt für Umwelt und Energie, Kollegiumstrasse 28, \n Postfach 2162, 6431 Schwyz, \n Beigeladene, \n |\n

\n\n

\n