Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 132 • VG SZ III 2022 132 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Protective Mandate Due to Incapacitation

Numero d'incarto III 2022 132
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant challenged a decision by the lower court establishing a protective mandate for the adult on the grounds that the required state of necessity had not been sufficiently established. The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the lower court had correctly determined that the adult was unable to manage their affairs due to health-related incapacitation, which established the necessary state of necessity under the relevant protection law to justify the imposition of the protective mandate.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF; Appeal Regarding Protective Mandate Due to Incapacitation: The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the lower court had correctly determined that the adult was unable to manage their affairs due to health-related incapacitation, which established the necessary state of necessity under the relevant protection law to justify the imposition of the protective mandate.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
protezione dello Stato stato di salute durata dell'incapacità lavorativa violazione di norme di protezione obbligo di motivazione violazione del mandato

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF
The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
III 2018 209
Appeal Regarding Adult Protective Measure and Alternative Care Arrangement
III 2021 140
Appeal Against Continuation of Protective Measure for Person
III 2022 86
Appeal Against Protective Assistance Arrangement for Adult
III 2018 212
Appeal of Protective Measure Decision
III 2020 127
Child and Adult Protective Services Appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 132 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Oktober 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Oxana Straub, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB), Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Errichtung einer Vertretungsbeistandschaft) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: