Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 127 • VG SZ III 2022 127 Generato dall'IA

Planning Authority Decision Appeal

Numero d'incarto III 2022 127
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The proceedings involved several appellants challenging decisions made by local and cantonal planning authorities concerning building regulations or zoning amendments, though the specific nature of the dispute is not fully detailed. The court's reasoning, implied by the context of planning disputes, likely centered on whether the challenged administrative decisions adhered to the applicable land use planning laws, procedural requirements, and whether the appellants had standing or demonstrated grounds for overturning the lower administrative or planning body's determinations regarding the development or use of the land in question.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF; Planning Authority Decision Appeal: The court's reasoning, implied by the context of planning disputes, likely centered on whether the challenged administrative decisions adhered to the applicable land use planning laws, procedural requirements, and whether the appellants had standing or demonstrated grounds for overturning the lower administrative or planning body's determinations regarding the development or use of the land in question.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
legittimazione a ricorrere utilizzazione del fondo ente locale approvazione dei piani autorità amministrativa norme per l'edilizia

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF
The provision dictates the imposition of costs on the losing party (the Beschwerdeführer) for the federal administrative court proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
III 2018 9
Appeal Against Planning Approval Decision
III 2024 189
Planning Appeal Against Administrative Decision and Corporate Interests
III 2020 91
Appeal Regarding Spatial Planning and Land Use Decisions
III 2019 77
Appeal Against Planning Decision
III 2023 153
Appeal Against Municipal Planning Decision

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

The provision dictates the imposition of costs on the losing party (the Beschwerdeführer) for the federal administrative court proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 127 III 2022 128 III 2022 129 III 2022 130 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Februar 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin Verfahren III 2022 127, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer Verfahren III 2022 128, \n3. C.________, \n Beschwerdeführer Verfahren III 2022 129, \n4. Stiftung D.________, vertreten durch E.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin Verfahren III 2022 130, \n diese vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin F.________, \n |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirksrat Einsiedeln, Hauptstrasse 78, Postfach 161, 8840 Einsiedeln, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n3. Kloster Einsiedeln, Verwaltung, 8840 Einsiedeln, \n4. Bezirk Einsiedeln, Hauptstrasse 78, Postfach 161, 8840 Einsiedeln, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n |\n

\n\n

\n