Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 121 • VG SZ III 2022 121 Generato dall'IA

Plaintiffs v. Defendant: Appeal Regarding Restitution for Unperformed Contractual Services

Numero d'incarto III 2022 121
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal by plaintiffs against a lower court's decision that dismissed their claim seeking the recovery of payments made under a contract, where the defendant had not performed their agreed-upon services. The court reasoned that the plaintiffs, despite having initiated performance under the contract, failed to timely and properly set a deadline for the defendant's performance, and subsequently failed to establish a legally effective notice of default, thus precluding their claim for restitution based on non-performance.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Plaintiffs v. Defendant: Appeal Regarding Restitution for Unperformed Contractual Services: The court reasoned that the plaintiffs, despite having initiated performance under the contract, failed to timely and properly set a deadline for the defendant's performance, and subsequently failed to establish a legally effective notice of default, thus precluding their claim for restitution based on non-performance.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
risarcimento contrattuale del danno restituzione e risarcimento azione di accertamento termine di pagamento indebito ricorso per inadempienza
Generato dall'IA
ZK1 2022 44
Contractual Liability Appeal Dismissal
ZK1 2021 7
Claim for Payment Appeal Dismissed
ZK1 2024 18
Appeal of Monetary Judgment Based on Contract Dispute
I 2020 90
Contractual Dispute Over Service Payment and Quality
ZK1 2011 10
Appeal Regarding Contractual Defects

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 121 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Urteil vom 16. Dezember 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. E.________ \n2. F.________ \n3. G.________ \n4. H.________ GmbH \n Kläger, \n alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw R.________ |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n I.________, \n Beklagte, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. J.________, |\n \n\n

\n