Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 115 • VG SZ III 2022 115 Generato dall'IA

Guardianship Termination Appeal under Protective Law

Numero d'incarto III 2022 115
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party appealed a lower court's decision regarding child and adult protective law, specifically concerning the termination of a legal guardianship (Beistandschaft). The court's reasoning, delivered in a decision dated August 29, 2022, focused on whether the prerequisites for ending the guardianship were met, presumably finding either that the conditions necessitating the guardianship no longer existed or that the termination was otherwise appropriate under the relevant protective law statutes.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Guardianship Termination Appeal under Protective Law: The court's reasoning, delivered in a decision dated August 29, 2022, focused on whether the prerequisites for ending the guardianship were met, presumably finding either that the conditions necessitating the guardianship no longer existed or that the termination was otherwise appropriate under the relevant protective law statutes.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
tutela procedura di protezione degli adulti soppressione delle prestazioni sospensione del diritto di visita perizia giuridica interesse del figlio
Generato dall'IA
III 2020 50
Appeal Regarding Guardianship Report and Visitation Rights Under Child and Adult Protection Law
III 2019 176
Appeal of Adult Protective Guardianship Establishment
III 2018 101
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision
III 2020 73
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision
III 2019 136
Appeal Against Termination of Representative Guardianship

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 115 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. August 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Irene Thalmann, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Aufhebung einer Beistandschaft) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: