Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 11 • VG SZ III 2022 11 Generato dall'IA

Residency Appeal Review

Numero d'incarto III 2022 11
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A petitioner appealed a decision by lower authorities concerning their right to reside or remain, likely relating to immigration status, after an initial application or extension was denied or limited. The court's reasoning would have involved a review of the factual basis for the initial decision, the application of relevant statutory or regulatory provisions concerning residency rights, and whether the lower authorities correctly interpreted and applied the law to the petitioner's specific circumstances before upholding or overturning the prior ruling.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Residency Appeal Review: The court's reasoning would have involved a review of the factual basis for the initial decision, the application of relevant statutory or regulatory provisions concerning residency rights, and whether the lower authorities correctly interpreted and applied the law to the petitioner's specific circumstances before upholding or overturning the prior ruling.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto di rimanere diritto legale esame della domanda d'asilo statuto di dimora legittimazione a ricorrere sfratto
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 80
Residence Determination Appeal
III 2022 174
Appeal of Foreign National's Residence Status Denial
III 2020 109
Failure to Submit Signed Appeal Leads to Dismissal of Residency Application Review
I 2021 15
Administrative Appeal Decision Review
III 2023 82
Appeal Against Refusal of Residency Permit and Expulsion Order

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 11 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. April 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Migration, Steistegstrasse 13, Postfach 454, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, Vorinstanzen, \n |\n

\n\n

\n