Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2022 104 • VG SZ III 2022 104 Generato dall'IA

Administrative Permit Rejection Appeal Inadmissibility

Numero d'incarto III 2022 104
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party challenged administrative decisions concerning the rejection of a permit application for constructing an apartment building, which was subsequently upheld by various cantonal authorities. The court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the rejection decision directly and currently affected their rights, as the application process had not progressed to a stage where a specific legal entitlement to the permit could be asserted against the public interest considerations cited by the authorities, rendering the appeal premature and lacking the necessary standing.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Administrative Permit Rejection Appeal Inadmissibility: The court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the rejection decision directly and currently affected their rights, as the application process had not progressed to a stage where a specific legal entitlement to the permit could be asserted against the public interest considerations cited by the authorities, rendering the appeal premature and lacking the necessary standing.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
legittimazione a contestare licenza domanda indirizzata all'autorità legittimazione a ricorrere edificio pubblico ritiro dell'autorizzazione permesso di abitabilità Umweltschutzrecht (Schadstoffmessung) | Umweltschutzrecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.
Generato dall'IA
III 2017 161
Building Permit Challenge Inadmissibility
III 2023 181
Appeal Against Building Permit Denial Lacks Standing Due to Existing Zoning Regulations
III 2018 54
Appeal of Building Permit Denial Regarding Procedural Compliance
III 2019 162
Appeal Against Construction Permit Denial Upheld
III 2023 20
Petitioner's Appealability of Partial Administrative Decision Regarding Building Permit

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2022 104 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. November 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________ GmbH, \n2. B.________ GmbH, \n3. C.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Ingenbohl, Parkstrasse 1, Postfach 253, 6440 Brunnen, \n2. Amt für Umwelt und Energie, Kollegiumstrasse 28, \n Postfach 2162, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n