Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2021 95 • VG SZ III 2021 95 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Protective Services Decision

Numero d'incarto III 2021 95
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party challenged a decision by the lower authority concerning child and adult protective services. The court's reasoning, which is not fully detailed in the provided excerpt but is implied by the nature of the appeal against a protective services decision, would typically involve reviewing whether the lower authority correctly applied relevant laws regarding the best interests of the child or the protected adult, assessing the factual basis for the protective measures ordered, and determining if procedural fairness was observed in reaching the initial determination.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Kindes- und Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Entzug des Aufenthaltsbestimmungsrechts und Unterbringung von 3 Kindern) | Kindes- und Erwachsenenschutzrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
base fattuale interesse del figlio controllo della procedura procedura di protezione degli adulti decisione motivata accertamento giudiziale di diritti
Generato dall'IA
III 2020 127
Child and Adult Protective Services Appeal
III 2018 212
Appeal of Protective Measure Decision
III 2020 169
Appeal Against Child Protection Authority Ruling on Protective Measures
III 2022 73
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Protective Measures Decision
III 2023 107
Appeal of Protective Care Decision

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2021 95 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 3. September 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Stefanie Zlauwinen, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) C.________, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. D.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n |\n

\n\n

\n