Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2021 86 • VG SZ III 2021 86 Generato dall'IA

Applicants v. Municipality on Citizenship Denial

Numero d'incarto III 2021 86
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Four applicants sought municipal citizenship, which a lower court denied after the municipality conducted an internal review concluding the applicants did not sufficiently integrate, specifically noting a lack of cultural participation and an inability to discuss current events, prompting the applicants to appeal this decision. The appellate court reasoned that the lower court's decision was based on insufficient evidence and failed to adequately consider the applicants' overall integration efforts, including their sustained residence and employment, thus finding the standard for denying citizenship—a substantial lack of integration—was not met based on the provided facts.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Applicants v. Municipality on Citizenship Denial: The appellate court reasoned that the lower court's decision was based on insufficient evidence and failed to adequately consider the applicants' overall integration efforts, including their sustained residence and employment, thus finding the standard for denying citizenship—a substantial lack of integration—was not met based on the provided facts.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cittadinanza inserimento professionale integrazione insufficiente naturalizzazione agevolata diritto di determinare il luogo di dimora attinenza comunale Einbürgerungen (Erteilung Gemeindebürgerrecht) | Einbürgerungen

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2021 86 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 30. September 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n3. C.________, \n4. D.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. E.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n F.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Einbürgerungen (Erteilung Gemeindebürgerrecht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: