Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2021 53 • VG SZ III 2021 53 Generato dall'IA

Building Permit Denial Upheld Over Setback Violations

Numero d'incarto III 2021 53
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party challenged the rejection of their building application, which was denied by the local building commission and subsequently upheld by the cantonal government council, primarily because the proposed construction did not meet the required setback distances from neighboring properties, which the lower authorities correctly interpreted as legally binding based on the established local land use plan. The court affirmed the decisions, reasoning that the planning rules mandated the setbacks to ensure adequate spacing between structures, and the applicant failed to demonstrate grounds for an exemption, thus upholding the denial of the building permit.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Building Permit Denial Upheld Over Setback Violations: The court affirmed the decisions, reasoning that the planning rules mandated the setbacks to ensure adequate spacing between structures, and the applicant failed to demonstrate grounds for an exemption, thus upholding the denial of the building permit.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
violazione delle distanze legali licenza edilizia violazione degli oneri dell'autorizzazione restrizioni di zona approvazione dei piani divieto di costruzione di diritto pubblico
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 49
Appeal Regarding Building Permit Denial Based on Setback Violation
III 2019 84
Building Permit Setback Dispute
III 2020 27
Building Permit Denial Upheld for Violation of Land Use Plan
III 2019 100
Permit Denial Upheld on Spatial Planning Grounds
III 2019 174
Building Permit Denial Upheld Due to Planning Violation

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2021 53 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. Juni 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Baukommission der Gemeinde Schwyz, Herrengasse 23, \n Postfach 34, 6431 Schwyz, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n