Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2021 45 • VG SZ III 2021 45 Generato dall'IA

Bar Association Disciplinary Action Upheld

Numero d'incarto III 2021 45
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A legal representative filed a complaint challenging a disciplinary decision made by a cantonal bar association's commission, which had imposed sanctions. The court considered the initial factual findings and the resulting disciplinary action taken by the lower body against the legal professional. The court's reasoning affirmed the decision, concluding that the conduct in question constituted a violation of professional obligations warranting the imposed sanction, thereby upholding the prior ruling.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Bar Association Disciplinary Action Upheld: The court considered the initial factual findings and the resulting disciplinary action taken by the lower body against the legal professional. The court's reasoning affirmed the decision, concluding that the conduct in question constituted a violation of professional obligations warranting the imposed sanction, thereby upholding the prior ruling.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sanzione disciplinare associazione professionale condotta precedente divieto di rappresentanza dell'avvocato sanzione disciplinare del notaio rappresentanza legale Anwaltsrecht | Verschiedenes
Generato dall'IA
III 2021 44
Lawyer Disciplinary Action Upheld Over Client Communication and Billing
III 2021 68
Attorney Disciplinary Appeal Affirmation
III 2020 112
Attorney Costs in Dismissed Disciplinary Proceedings
ZK1 2024 10
Members' Association Dispute Regarding Dismissals and Circular Resolutions
ZK1 2021 41
Association Expulsion Validity and Procedural Due Process

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2021 45 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 31. Mai 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marcel Käselau, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Anwaltskommission des Kantons Schwyz, \n Kollegiumstrasse 28, Postfach 2265, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. C.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n |\n

\n\n

\n